Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 6 month release cycle

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

LTS currently relies upon the existence of a simultaneous release as its starting point. The LTS working group would be a very poor replacement for the Planning Council in running the simultaneous release. For example, one of the major features of the Planning Council is that it has representation on it from each of the PMCs. The LTS working group steering committee  does not.

ok, fair enough...but if the LTS has been investing so much time and effort into building a process for being able to release updates to simultaneous releases, will they assume that burden from the Planning Council eventually?  Will that effort be rolled back into the simultaneous release process that the Planning Council currently takes care of?

maybe a slight off topic, if so my apologies

jesse

 

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev