WTP has declared M4 build, so +3 projects with WTP dependencies can now proceed. Thanks!
> Wouldn't you just build against the candidate that they have already contributed?
That would produce a milestone candidate, not a final milestone contribution, which would still need to be re-built and re-tested against the actual final versions of all dependencies. I understand the difficulties in delivering circular dependencies, which does require some seriously fuzzy releng, but most projects on the release train do not have a circular dependencies. We have the +1/+2/+3 system.
- Konstantin
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Arthorne
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:04 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build?
Wouldn't you just build against the candidate that they have already contributed? I don't follow how this prevents a project from contributing their own candidate to the aggregation. There are enough circular dependencies between projects at the same "level" in the train that we could never produce anything if nobody contributed a candidate until all their upstream dependencies are declared themselves completely done. For example Platform requires EMF and vice-versa, so we each need to build against each other's candidates before either can be "done".
John
From: "Konstantin Komissarchik" <konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Cross project issues'" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.'" <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 12/19/2012 02:56 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build?
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Just to clarify… Presence in the aggregation build is only one necessary aspect. Many projects are waiting on WTP to declare M4, so we know what to build against.
- Konstantin
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuck Bridgham
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:10 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: 'Cross project issues'; wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build?
We are in the candidate aggregation build, we just delayed the "official" declare because all teams were delayed being down in numbers this time of year.
The declare is coming very soon - (Carl is on vacation officially...)
Thanks - Chuck
Senior Architect, RAD Java EE Tools, WTP PMC Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
From: "Konstantin Komissarchik" <konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.'" <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'Cross project issues'" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/19/2012 12:28 PM
Subject: [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build?
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Is there an ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? I see that every project besides JSDT and releng have signed off?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_Smoke_Test_Results_R350_12172012
The lack of WTP M4 build is blocking all of the downstream projects from making their M4 contributions.
- Konstantin_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
