Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end o

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:47:39 +0100
Delivered-to: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cross-project-issues-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cross-project-issues-dev>, <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 12/17/2012 11:20 PM, David M Williams wrote:

gmp-gmf-tooling.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build (2 matches)
...
mmt-qvto.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build

GMF Tooling depends on QVTo.
What are the plans for QVTo to re-enable their contributions so that GMF Tooling can get back in?

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1
  - From: Ed Willink

References:
- [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1
  - From: David M Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] OCL Core (+1) will be late
Next by Date: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1
Previous by thread: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1
Next by thread: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for Kepler M4 at end of +1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top