Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclips

[Kim Moir <Kim_Moir@xxxxxxxxxx>]

To mitigate the risk of a rogue post-milestone
build, I would encourage all teams to download our latest integration build
and give it a try.  Run your JUnits against it.  Use for it for
every day development.   If you see any issues, don't delay, open
a bug today...

http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/I20080129-1400/index.php

Next week, I would encourage teams to
try out out one of builds toward M5 which will be running on the following
schedule.

http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/platform-releng/buildSchedule.html

Kim

Nick Boldt/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/30/2008 12:21 PM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] RE: [cross-project-issues-dev]        EclipseCon and Ganymede M5

Platform's scheduled M5 release is Friday Feb 8. Our
M5 is due the
next day on Monday (+1 == Feb 11). History says Ed (or someone
Ed-like) finds a problem with M5 within the first few days of use,
prompting M5eh to be rolled out by week's end. This is why there's a
week lag between +1 and +2, so accomodate the slippage. But as Ed's on
vacation through the 9th, we may not find the 'eh' in time.

If we condense the schedule so that +2 is done on Feb 13, +3 on Feb
14, and EPP on Feb 15, that still leaves two days -- Feb 11 & 12 --
for M5 testing & platform respins, and Feb 18 for public releases and
copying to memory sticks. It's tight, but if there's no 'eh' this
year, it may be doable.

Of course the other approach might be extend the memory stick
deadline... is that possible?

Incidentally, which package(s) will be on the stick?

Nick


On Jan 30, 2008 5:46 AM, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We (by which I mean Nick, because I'll be away on vacation starting
> Saturday for two weeks not causing him troubles by changing the code)
could
> try to pull EMF in to be a +0 if that helps...  I.e., we could
try to be
> ready the same day as the platform's M5...
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265  (t/l 313)
>
>
>
>
>
>              "Oberhuber,
>              Martin"
>              <Martin.Oberhuber
                     
                   To
>              @windriver.com>
          "eclipse.org-planning-council"
>              Sent by:    
             <eclipse.org-planning-council@eclip
>              eclipse.org-plann
        se.org>
>              ing-council-bounc
                     
                   cc
>              es@xxxxxxxxxxx
>                    
                     
                     
   Subject
>                    
                   [eclipse.org-planning-council]
RE:
>              01/30/2008 04:50  
       [cross-project-issues-dev]
>              AM      
                 EclipseCon
and Ganymede M5
>
>
>              Please respond to
>              "eclipse.org-plan
>                ning-council"
>              <eclipse.org-plan
>              ning-council@ecli
>                  pse.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1 for Ganymede on the stick. That would be a tremendous benefit not
only
>      for Conference attendees, but also for Ganymede
projects since by
>      that way we receive an extra amount of early integration
testing.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
>
>  From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Bjorn
>  Freeman-Benson
>  Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:59 AM
>  To: eclipse.org-planning-council; Cross project issues
>  Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] EclipseCon and Ganymede
M5
>
>  Ganymede Project Teams,
>  The Ganymede M5 final build is Feb 25th (
>  http://wiki.eclipse.org/Ganymede#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates).
>  However, the deadline for preloading bits on the EclipseCon
USB memory
>  stick is Feb 18th and the memory stick this year is large enough
to
>  contain all the presentations and all the Ganymede packages.
>
>  So... do we want to compress the M5 schedule in some way so
that we can
>  preload the M5 bits on the EclipseCon memory stick?
>
>  - Bjorn
>  --
>  [end of message]_______________________________________________
>  eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
>  eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev