Definitely feeling a bit lost here. Why is a JNDI like tree concept needed? To retrieve stored objects rather than just strings? Dealing with the concepts of collections/arrays/containers? If so, adopting some string based syntax like [x] does not help?
I am in favour of a tree structure.
Probably an unfashionable view but there is a danger that you just reimplement the javax.naming api, without mutability, when all required functionality for tree walking etc is added.
Steve
From: config-dev <config-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Dmitry Kornilov
Sent: 09 December 2021 19:42
To: Jakarta Config project developer discussions <config-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [config-dev] Tree structure vs flat structure discussion thread
Hi,
As we discussed on the meeting today, I am going to create two email threads: one for the subj discussion (this thread) and another one for voting (I’ll do it later). The rule is simple: discuss
the subj here and use voting thread only for voting.
To initiate the discussion:
Here is a link to Tomas’ PR for tree structure:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/config/pull/22
Here is my private gist with some thoughts: https://gist.github.com/m0mus/1bf0a3f76e3492fa764263b4b180a50a
Thanks,
Dmitry
P.S.
Creating the voting thread now…