Re: [cdt-dev] Full indexer accuracy claims on wiki

[Mike Kucera <mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Markus. I've updated the wiki page again to mention that the full indexer has been removed. Its still worth explaining the difference because the full indexer still exists in older versions of CDT, and for people to understand why it was removed.

Mike Kucera
Rational Multicore Tooling
UI Team Lead
IBM Toronto Lab
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx

"Schorn, Markus" ---05/11/2011 07:48:07 AM---The one thing that is wrong about the section is, that the Full Indexer has been removed. Markus.

From:	"Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	05/11/2011 07:48 AM
Subject:	Re: [cdt-dev] Full indexer accuracy claims on wiki
Sent by:	cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

The one thing that is wrong about the section is, that the Full Indexer has been removed.
Markus.
 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Kucera
Sent: Freitag, 06. Mai 2011 18:14
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] Full indexer accuracy claims on wiki
Importance: Low

I wrote a page for the CDT wiki some time ago describing how parsing and indexing work. I just realized that in the section about the differences between the Fast and Full indexers I made some incorrect claims. I wrote that the Full indexer is fully accurate, which I believe is untrue.

I have update the wiki so I think its fixed now.

Markus, could you please confirm that the section on indexing is accurate:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/designs/Overview_of_Parsing#Indexing


Thanks._______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev