Re: [cbi-dev] Bug 372794 CBI build of platform native SWT code

[Thanh Ha <thanh.ha@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Igor,

Building on macosx 64bit works fine for me and the generated swt 
org.eclipse.cocoa.macosx.x86_64-3.100.0-SNAPSHOT.jar contains class files.

Same with Linux 64bit I'm able to compile and the output produces a jar 
that contains classes. I've attached a log of my own runs for both 
macosx and Linux builds in case it is helpful.

The only platform I haven't been able to build on is Windows since I'm 
still trying to figure out how to setup the build environment on Windows.


Thanh


On 07/28/2012 11:44 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> I can't build this.
>
> Although the build does not fail on mac osx, generated swt fragments do
> not include any .class files.
>
> Building on linux x86-64 just fails with
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run 
> (copy-launcher-natives) on project 
> org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86: An Ant BuildException has 
> occured: 
> /var/tmp/lts/R4_platform-aggregator/rt.equinox.binaries/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86 
> does not exist.
> [ERROR] around Ant part ...<copy todir="." overwrite="true">... @ 4:36 
> in 
> /var/tmp/lts/R4_platform-aggregator/rt.equinox.framework/bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86/target/antrun/build-main.xml
>
> Does this work for anybody on any platform?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
> On 12-07-26 4:14 PM, Thanh Ha wrote:
> > I went ahead and made the changes below and updated the wiki [1].
> >
> > eclipse.platform.swt.binaries:
> > http://git.eclipse.org/c/cbi/eclipse.platform.swt.binaries.git/commit/?h=Juno_RC4_R4&id=68b804917da5da9081cbfc27f7a61cdcef8d0344 
> >
> >
> > rt.equinox.framework:
> > http://git.eclipse.org/c/cbi/rt.equinox.framework.git/commit/?h=Juno_RC4&id=ec0d28949042c96eb356055dbf2fafdc11d7f8f1 
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanh
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/CBI/Eclipse_Platform_Build#Build_Natives
> >
> > On 07/26/2012 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Daniel wrote:
> > > > > I'm thinking of switching the linux format to ws.os.arch format so
> > > > > that it's more consistent and was wondering if anyone had any issues
> > > > > if I made this change? or perhaps there's another format we should
> > > > > be using?
> > > +1 for the change everywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cbi-dev mailing list
> > cbi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cbi-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cbi-dev mailing list
> cbi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cbi-dev

Attachment: linux_log.DEFANGED-6
Description: application/defanged-6

Attachment: macosx_log.DEFANGED-7
Description: application/defanged-7