Re: Re : [aspectj-users] Re: [groovy-user] AspectG?

[Eric Tanter <etanter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, that's already the case in AspectScript, since Javascript has both objects (prototype-based) and higher-order functions.

I think the extra interesting bit with Scala is going to be related to its type system and composition model.

-- Éric


On Jun 17, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Ramnivas Laddad wrote:

> Indeed, that will be an interesting multi-paradigm language: functional object aspect oriented :-)
> 
> -Ramnivas
> 
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Miles Sabin <miles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Adams <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If you want this support, make sure to vote for these issues.  For
> > Scala support, you might want to enter your own issues at the AspectJ
> > and Scala projects.
> 
> Aspects for Scala would be of interest to me.
> 
> If I had unlimited free time I would most likely investigate the
> possibility of doing it via a combination of a Scala compiler plugin
> and a Scala internal DSL for specifying pointcuts, advice etc. rather
> than creating a whole new AspectS language akin to AspectJ. I would
> imagine that the standard AspectJ runtime could be reused pretty much
> as is.
> 
> It'd be a pretty cool project to work on ...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Miles
> 
> --
> Miles Sabin
> tel: +44 7813 944 528
> gtalk: miles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> skype: milessabin
> http://www.chuusai.com/
> http://twitter.com/milessabin
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users