RE: [aspectj-users] [aspect-users] Static initialization with JDK 1.5 an

[Rifflard Mickaël <Mickael.Rifflard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Andy,

Thanks for this fix. I will try it quickly.

Could you tell me the bug id of static initialization when this one is created?

Thanks,

Mickaël RIFFLARD
Atos Origin

-----Message d'origine-----
De : aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]De la part de Andrew Clement
Envoyé : jeudi 13 janvier 2005 13:14
À : aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] [aspect-users] Static initialization with JDK 1.5 annotation



That should work ... but it doesn't right now - I just tried it, we'll fix it right 
away.  Incidentally the problem you hit a little while ago with within(@Entity) not 
working has now been fixed in the latest dev build (see bug 81863), you can get the 
dev build from here: 

http://download.eclipse.org/technology/ajdt/dev/aspectj-DEVELOPMENT.jar 

Basically, this now works: 

after() returning: within(@Entity *) && call(* *(..)) { 
} 

Andy. 
--- 
Andy Clement 
AspectJ 
clemas@xxxxxxxxxx 



Rifflard Mickaël <Mickael.Rifflard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
13/01/2005 09:19 Please respond to
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

To<aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
cc
Subject[aspectj-users] [aspect-users] Static initialization with JDK 1.5 annotation







Hi all,

I'm currently trying to match static initialization of objects with annotation.

I try this

                public aspect StaticInit {

                                 after() : staticinitialization(@Entity test.*) {
                                                  System.out.println(thisJoinPoint.getSignature().toString());
                                 }
                }

If I execute this aspect on source code :

                @Entity
                public class A {}
and
                public class B {
                                 public static void main(String[] args) {
                                                  A a = new A();
                                 }
                }

I obtain

                B.<clinit>
                A.<clinit>

I don't understand why my aspect match B initialization whereas this object does not have the annotation.

Is this a bad writing ? If so, what is the good writing ?

Thanks,

Mickaël RIFFLARD
Atos Origin

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users