You
            mean that “PolarSys IDE 0.7.1” should be better. It’s true
            that we had the question “What’s the difference with
            PolarSys IDE 0.7?”.
        Then,
            I guess that:
        ·         We
            rename “PolarSys IDE 0.8” in “PolarSys IDE 0.7.1”
        ·         We
            keep a release documentation to trace the release with its
            differences
        ·         No
            release review is required
         
        Thanks,
         
        Benoît
         
        
         
         
        
          On 02/24/2014 11:09 AM, LANGLOIS Benoit
            wrote:
         
        
          1.
              Plugins and features are still the same, except that we
              changed the PolarSys IDE version number. Do we need to
              submit an IP log?
        
        No. If there are no actual intellectual
          property changes, then a new IP Log is not required.
          
          
        2.
            Can we submit a review documentation even if we don’t have
            the version number of the aggregated components?
        Strictly speaking, this sounds very similar
          conceptually to a "service release" (AKA "bugfix" release).
          There are no significant new features, and no new IP.
          According to the EDP, no review is required.
          
          Service releases are typically denoted by an increment of
          third segment, but there is no specific rule that requires
          this.
          
          The project may benefit from the extra exposure that comes
          with a review, so you may want to consider doing one anyway.
          
          But it's up to you.
          
          Wayne