Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-pmc] vjet initial contribution

I neglected to say that "org.eclipse.vjet" sound exactly right to me :-)


On 08/20/2012 05:08 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
The general rule is that you should use the project's short name in bundle and package names.



On 08/20/2012 05:03 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:

Note that top-level namespace usage must be approved by EMO. This usually happens during the project proposal phase as part of approving full and short name for the project. If this didn’t happen, please make sure to loop in EMO into this discussion.


- Konstantin



From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuck Bridgham
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 1:56 PM
To: Justin Early
Cc: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; David Carver
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] vjet initial contribution


Hi Justin,

Traditionally all subprojects have either the "wst" or "jst" prefix - but this is mostly for historical reasons:
Given that the project is entering incubation, and in keeping the most flexiblity moving forward,  I think "org.eclipse.vjet.*" is a good namespace, but I added this to the pmc mailing list to get their opinion as well.

Thanks - Chuck

Senior Architect, RAD Java EE Tools, WTP PMC Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC

From:        Justin Early <earlyster@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        Chuck Bridgham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:        David Carver <dcarver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        08/20/2012 02:45 PM
Subject:        vjet initial contribution

Hi Chuck,

I am working on plan for initial contribution and wanted to know if the package


Is an ok namespace for vjet.



wtp-pmc mailing list

Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

Back to the top