I added another comment, but in general this
seems odd – either the CQ language that says “approved by Arthur
Ryman” should be definitive or the CQ should be modified to remove the pseudo-approval
section if we’re going to ignore it. Let me ask Janet and Bjorn what
their collective intent is…an actual approval field in IPzilla would
probably be the best solution of all.
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Brealey
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007
9:39 AM
To: WTP
PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,and
Group discussions)
Cc: WTP
PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,and
Group discussions); wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx; Kathy Chan
Subject: RE: [wtp-pmc] IPZilla
1089
Tim,
there
is a reference to Arthur as the intended approver in the CQ as submitted by me,
but not an actual approval comment from him. They need to hear it from the
horse's mouth as it were, similar to comment 3 in 1052,
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1052#c3.
Cheers - CB.
Chris Brealey
Senior Advisory Technical Manager, Rational Java Web Services, IBM Canada Ltd.
D3-275, D3/ENX/8200/MKM, 8200 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario, Canada, L6G 1C7
cbrealey@xxxxxxxxxx, 905.413.6038,
tieline:969.6038, fax:905.413.4920
|
"Tim Wagner"
<twagner@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/04/2007 12:20 PM
|
Please
respond to
"WTP PMC communications
\(including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions\)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"WTP PMC
communications \(including coordination, announcements,
and Group discussions\)"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
Kathy Chan/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-pmc] IPZilla 1089
|
|
Arthur added an approval to 1089 as well, so I
think they’re both taken care of.
In the future, you can have these added to the weekly PMC
call agenda, and then one of us will automatically take on the approval
notation as an action item.
Thanks,
-t
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Brealey
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:34 AM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Kathy Chan
Subject: [wtp-pmc] IPZilla 1089
To the WTP PMC members,
as I think you all know, the folks at WSO2 [1] will be contributing a set of
plugins to WTP 2.0 to support Apache Axis2 via our Web services platform [2]. I
have two contribution questionnaires on the go, 1052 [3] and 1089 [4], the
second of which needs a PMC approval comment before we can proceed much
further. Would one of you, perhaps Tim, David or Naci, please post a
"+1" approval note to CQ 1089? Needless to say, drop me a line any
time if you have questions about this work. FYI, Arthur approved 1052, so it's
good to go.
[1] http://www.wso2.com/
[2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Axis2_Integration_in_WTP
[3] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
[4] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
Thanks very much,
Cheers - CB.
Chris Brealey
Senior Advisory Technical Manager, Rational Java Web Services, IBM Canada Ltd.
D3-275, D3/ENX/8200/MKM, 8200 Warden Avenue, Markham, Ontario, Canada, L6G 1C7
cbrealey@xxxxxxxxxx, 905.413.6038,
tieline:969.6038, fax:905.413.4920_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
