Agreed.
From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006
12:12 PM
To:
raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx; WTP PMC communications (including
coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Cc: WTP PMC communications
(including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions);
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [wtp-pmc] PMC
approval: When does the quiet periodstart for1.5.1..
+1
Today
should be the last build for 1.5.1 unless we hit a stop-ship problem.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
"raghunathan
srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/21/2006 06:06 PM
|
Please
respond to
"raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx"
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"WTP PMC communications (including
coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-pmc] PMC approval: When does the
quiet period start for1.5.1..
|
|
I was asking for the plan. So after today, a
request for PMC approval should only be for show-stopper regressions.
Thanks for the clarification.
-Raghu
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:49 PM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] PMC approval: When does the quiet period
start for1.5.1..
Is that a rhetorical question, implying you think its time to stop re-spining? :)
Or .. are you really asking what the plan is?
Assuming the latter, yes, it is "today" ... at the status call, we
said we'd do one more build to pick up wsdl editor fixes. And we said the
critical bug 156768 was still being investigated, and that is the
source of Kathy's proposed work-around fix in bug 158210. I encourage a
positive for that one. (or, be explicit if you disapprove, otherwise it will be
released later this evening).
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158210
Also, the data tools team has informed me their clients have found a fairly bad
bug that can be fixed by them just fixing some of their XMI definition files.
They will soon be requesting approval for that one too. (I suspect safe since
"just" XMI files).
So ... as long as "today" means midnight we are on track. I think
these few still going in are all highly isolated do not invalidate other
testing,
and will be perceived as substantial improvements in WTP quality, so, in my
opinion, they are worth the tiny risk of getting a bad build.
Naturally, if any of you on the PMC disagree, please don't hesitate to speak up
and we can discuss your concerns.
Thanks,
|
"raghunathan
srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/21/2006 05:08 PM
|
Please
respond to
"raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx"
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[wtp-pmc] PMC approval: When does the quiet
period start for 1.5.1..
|
|
Hi,
When will the PMC approval window close and the quiet period for the final
release begin? Isn’t it today?
Sorry if I missed the discussion on this in the status call.
Thanks
Raghu_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
