[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[wtp-pmc] Agenda for WTP PMC telecon for Tuesday, July 25th 2006
|
Call info:
- Tollfree in the US:
866-214-3176
- Alternate: 404-827-9098
- Access code: 8870689#
Call Time: 7am PDT / 10am PDT
Agenda:
- Community [Lawrence]
- Process issues [Tim]
- Requirements and 2.0 Planning
(Jochen)
- Component-level process
discussion recap from status call (see Arthur’s summary, attached)
- SAP request (see attached) and
adopter requirements solicitation
- STP interaction – see notice
below (#150905)
- 1.0.3 Rampdown status (David)
- 1.5.1 Status (David)
- JSF [Gerry[
- Dali/JPA [Neil]
- ATF [Robert]
-----Original Message-----
From:
stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Adrian Skehill
Sent: Thursday, July 20,
2006 1:25 AM
To: STP Dev list
Subject: [stp-dev] Service
Creation Initial Contribution
Hi All,
IONA
has recently submitted it's first proposed contribution to the STP project to
the EMO for consideration. It is broken down into two
contributions:
150905 IONA
Initial Contribution - JAX WS Framework Code
150908 IONA Initial Contribution - Celtix Tooling Support
These represent the creation
of some generic framework JAX WS code for support JAX WS based runtimes, and
then a specific Celtix implementation using this.
It's planned to continue
development activities on these immediately after the contribution so any
comments / suggestions are welcome.
Both of these bugs are
accessible together with source attachment from http://bugs.eclipse.org.
Regards,
Adrian Skehill.
UI Team Lead,
IONA Technologies.
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
|
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Arthur Ryman
[ryman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:24
PM
To: wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wtp-dev] Generating
Nicely Grouped Milestone Plan Reports fromBugzilla
Attachments:
ATT5943870.txt
On the telecon today we
discussed the use of Bugzilla as the primary way to record plan items. One of
the problems is that there will be a lot of items and we need a better way to
group them, for example, into Themes. I suggest we use the URL field in Bugzilla
for this purpose. We should define
Theme documents on the Wiki. These documents can point to more detailed specs in
our Web site. We should use the Theme documents to classify the Bugzilla entries
by entering the URL of the Theme document in the Bugzilla URL field. We can then
develop reports that group Bugzilla entries by URL. We can also use the Theme documents to provide some level
of hierarchy, say by adopting a naming convention for the URLs or using fragment
ids for subtopics on a Theme page. In the past, we generated Milestone Plan reports from Bugzilla by running
a script and committing the generated report to CVS (which then refreshes the
Web site). This meant that the reports were always slightly out of date. We
should convert these scripts to PHP so they are executed on demand and therefore
always up to date.
Arthur
Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog:
http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL
969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL
969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text:
4169395063@xxxxxxx
Title: Detailed planning regarding Web Service support
From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Barheine, Joachim
[joachim.barheine@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:04
AM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jagusch,
Andre
Subject: [wtp-pmc] Detailed planning regarding Web Service
support
Attachments: ATT7061577.txt
Hello,
as you may know SAP is one of the adopters of the WTP
platform. Of particular interest to us is the further development (for WTP 2.0)
in the web services area.
Two questions are very important to us here
- Will you introduce some sort of WS metamodel that
goes beyond WSDL editing (i.e. is not restricted to the WSDL editor but used
thoughout the entire WS parts)?
- Will support for WS-Security and WS-RM be tied to
Axis 2.0 or will it be officially pluggable?
We would be very thankful if you could provide us
with some insights in your current planning as we still have to decide how to
proceed with WTP adoption in the WS area.
Many thanks in advance for you help and
Best regards
Joachim