[wtp-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-committers] Eclipse project reviews
Just when you thought it was safe…time
to get the “external” release review slidedeck ready. We should
deliver these to Anne this Wednesday (June 14th). They are just a
slightly extended version of what you prepared for the internal reviews plus a
few boilerplate slides.
Here’s the format I would suggest
(each bullet point is one slide) based on previous reviews and community Q&A.
Feel free to modify – my one piece of advice is not to spend a lot of
time making it longer, as these reviews can be rather perfunctory. If you have
questions about the format or content, let me know. There may also be some
suggestions for Dali coming out of Monday’s review. We can also discuss
at the PMC call Tuesday morning, and in addition to sending the decks to Anne,
you should also submit them to the PMC for review prior to the public call –
minor edits between the deck you give Anne and the final version are ok.
statement of what the project is/does
is a pre-1.0 technology release review timed to coincide with WTP’s
material will be made available for download on top of the 3.2 / 1.5
platforms via WTP’s download site and update manager (separate from
of the committers/contributors/companies involved.
description of outreach/development of larger community:
calls participated in (e.g., WTP’s)
of mailing lists, newsgroups, etc. I.e., you’re a good citizen and
given, conferences attended (summary)
of recent reviews (move review, internal/WTP review, etc.)
Release schedule, including recent milestones, release date, a few
speculative future milestones and the rough features delivered in each. Statement
of current status, relationship to WTP builds, etc.
review. Something like the following boilerplate (and let’s verify
with Janet that we’re not fibbing ;-)
files and license files are complete and correct?: Yes
significant and third-party contributions have been reviewed by Eclipse
Legal? Yes: See project log for
log complete and has been reviewed by Eclipse Legal? Yes
URL is http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/ip_log.html
your APIs are provisional because this is a pre-1.0 release
statement of where/what those APIs are
you like, speculate on future growth areas for API (provisional or
otherwise) or timing of provisional à real
state explicitly that there are no end-of-life issues before there is no
test summary statement
open and resolved-but-not-closed bug counts
[mailto:eclipse.org-committers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anne Jacko
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:55
Eclipse project reviews
The following reviews are taking place in the next few weeks. The conference
call numbers are below.
eclipse.org-committers mailing list