My recollection is that we (the PMC)
agreed to host ATF as an incubating subproject (same state JSF is in today),
ATF agreed to the hosting, and the EMO agreed to the change, so while I haven’t
seen any formal announcement around it, I’m taking that as a decision. I
updated the ATF creation proposal to state the new location explicitly and
Bjorn and Craig agreed to the wording.
For EJB/Dali: they (i.e., Shaun) and we agreed,
as I recall, that a successful 0.7 checkpoint & release review would result
in their graduation to WTP. (If anyone on the PMC disagrees with this plan,
please say so now so we can correct it.) While we can’t prove that review
will succeed in advance, I think it’s entirely fair to place the component
as it will exist circa the 1.5 release presuming a happy outcome.
From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006
1:23 PM
To: WTP PMC communications
(including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP
Architecture Block Diagram
I know we've "chatted" with EJB3 (Dali) and
AJAX projects about "incubating" them, but was under the impression
those relationships were not far enough along to claim they were "part of
our 1.5 release plan" as we are with JSF ... and, I thought, still some
discussion about how and when to do it ... but by all means ... Arthur? Tim?
... correct my memory if this was firmer than I recall. [and, technically, AJAX would be part of
WST].
Raghu Srinivasan
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/24/2006 03:48 PM
Please
respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination,
announcements, and Group discussions)"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP Architecture Block
Diagram
|
|
Hi David,
I agree that the JSF Tools project belongs to the JST project. Shouldn't the
EJB3 project be also part of JST?
-Raghu
David M Williams wrote:
Here's my
near final draft of our "2006 WTP Architecture" to put in the EMO's
2006 Eclipse Roadmap.
Well, a very high-level, simplistic block-diagram of an architecture, at least.
But, this is what Bjorn wants to collect from each top project as the
Architecture portion of the Eclipse Roadmap document. And ... that document is
supposed to be very high level.
I'd like to send to Bjorn late today (Friday) but could resend it on Saturday,
if any of you have any late breaking comments or concerns. And, sorry I didn't
give
more time for input/review.
I think its good, and correct, for what it is ... but, one thing I would like
confirmation of, Raghu, is if it is "ok" to include JSF right there
as if it is already part of the JST project.
If I recall correctly, I'm pretty sure that's what we've agreed to (in the
"1.5 timeframe", which is what this document is for) and is the path
we are currently on ... but didn't want to "jump the gun" or offend
anyone by seeming to subsume projects. I did make it a special color to denote
its special status :) ... but will likly tone that down a bit so its not so
garish.
I will still tweak the fonts, layouts and colors before I send to Bjorn (but
notes of gross spelling mistakes will still be appreciated :)
Or ... any other comments as well!
Looking back at last year's ... I can tell I've come a long way in my block
diagram making ability :)
Thanks.

_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc