Re: [wtp-dev] Questions for WTP in Fedora (and a patch!)

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I can help with the first question. 

That is the only place its used and
is useful. (And, not sure its all that useful there, any more :) 

Long ago, it was a place holder to use
in "production builds" that did nothing, but during special "test
builds" there would be a implementation included that would take certain
performance measurements (at a cost of an overall slowdown, that was not
desired for production builds). 

The source for it (if that's what you
are asking about) might be in the old, archived, VE project. But, not too
much too it, as I recall, other than some no-op classes which, as you imply,
you can probably just guess at).  Not sure where they put archived
code, but the bug that refers to it is bug 346887 [1].

HTH

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=346887






From:      
 Gerard Ryan <galileo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,

Date:      
 03/16/2013 12:32 PM
Subject:    
   [wtp-dev] Questions
for WTP in Fedora (and a patch!)
Sent by:    
   wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi folks,

I'm involved with building some parts of webtools in Fedora. I'm
currently in the process of preparing updates to 3.4.2, and I've run
into a bug (for Fedora, not webtools):

For Fedora packages, there can't be any bundled jar files involved in
the build process, we must build everything from scratch. I've just
noticed that we have overlooked perfmsr.jar that's included in
org.eclipse.jem.util/org.eclipse.perfmsr.core.stub

My question is, is there a feature somewhere that builds this jar, or is
this the only place that it's useful/exists? If it's part of some
feature from another project, I'll create a new package for that, and
make it available for the build of this package. If not, then I'll
figure out a way to build it in this package and link it to where it's
expected to be.

Also, I submitted a patch to an existing bug a couple of months ago. I'm
not sure if I need to submit it somewhere else to get it accepted. Since
I'm not a committer, I don't have access to Gerrit to propose it there.
The bug is at:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265772

If there's anything that you think needs to be changed for that to be
accepted, let me know and I'll try to get it done.

Thanks in advance for any guidance,
Gerard.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=uo0E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev