Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-dev] Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build S-3.1M2-20080928142920/

A more general concern from an adopter and down stream project stand point. How can builds be declared that aren't passing all their unit tests. It's goes against the fundamentals of having a clean build, if you declare a "stable" build that has failing unit tests.

How do I know as an adopter or a dependency on a project that it is a good build, if the build is never green. It's been a concern that I don't think has been adequately addressed. Especially if you take a look at the cruise control server and the status of the builds for the last several weeks.


Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
So what's the story with the DTP version referenced by our 3.1 stream? We are currently referencing dtp-sdk-1.6.1RC3-200809191336 <> while 3.0.2 shipped with 1.6.1 proper. I poked around on DTP download page and haven't found anything like 1.7 M2. There is a 1.6.2 that is in progress by the looks of it. Does anyone know what DTP team is planning for Galileo? - Konstantin

*From:* wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Helen Zhang
*Sent:* Sunday, September 28, 2008 9:02 PM
*To:* General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
*Subject:* [wtp-dev] Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build S-3.1M2-20080928142920/

*Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build *S-3.1M2-20080928142920/
Smoketest Results*


Helen Zhang *PMPĀ®
Rational Architecture Management Project Management Office
Eclipse Webtools Platform (WTP) **
IBM Toronto Software Lab | 8200 Warden Ave. | Markham | L6G 1C7
Email: hjzhang@xxxxxxxxxx | Phone: 905-413-3443 | T/L: 969-3443*


wtp-dev mailing list

Back to the top