Hello Chuck,
Thank you for your response. I would really
appreciate it if you could provide a patch for this. I have opened the
following bug to track this: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=207876
Thank you.
Hoi
From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuck Bridgham
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007
12:01 PM
To: General discussion of
project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: General discussion of
project-wide or architectural issues.; Jason A Sholl;
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Question
about the fix to Bug 163391
Sorry for the late response...
For
implementor's of EMF Resource classes not subclassing from ReferencedResource,
I can see how this could have caused a regression. I can submit a patch
for your internal use? (Also move fixes to 2.x and 3.x?).
Our
fix did resolve an issue where we were unloading resources too aggressively. But
I can change this slightly to account for non-"ReferencedResource"
instances.
ReferencedResources
have reference counting api's, and are used with the standard J2EE model api's.
-
Chuck
Rational Java EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)
|
"Konstantin
Komissarchik" <kosta@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/24/2007 09:14 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck
Bridgham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, Jason A Sholl/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-dev] Question about the fix to Bug
163391
|
|
Just to clarify...
We are trying to determine if this is due to our incorrect
usage of the api in question or if the fix for 163391 introduced a regression.
In either case, this has caused a really bad behavioral regression for us that
took a long time to track down. This was partly because we weren't expecting
such a change to be introduced in 1.5.3 and were focused on finding the cause
in our code. In any case, a prompt attention to help us resolve this would be
much appreciated.
Thanks,
- Konstantin
From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hoi Lam
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:59 PM
To: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx; jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wtp-dev] Question about the fix to Bug 163391
Hello
Chuck and Jason,
I have
a question regarding the fix for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163391
The
fix has tightened the condition logic to only unload resources that are
“Referenced resource” and not consistent…
Could
you elaborate on what is a “referenced resource” please (based on the
code, a “referenced resource” must be an instance of
org.eclipse.wst.common.internal.emf.resource.ReferencedResource).
In my
case, I have a resource that is an instance of
org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi.XMLResourceImpl, and due to the fix, the resource no
longer gets unloaded when it is outdated. As a result, the EMF model
representing the resource is out of sync when the resource is modified.
Your
feedback and any recommendation for a workaround would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Hoi
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that
may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message.
If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities,
that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged,
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message
in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it._______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
