Nope,
I think we got a little over zealous on our "updates" for 2.0 here.
This does indeed need to be corrected for the milestone. Thanks for
the heads up.
Neil
David M Williams wrote:
I've just noticed that many (or all)
the Dali projects have had their version number increased to "2.0.0"
for our forward (Ganymede) stream.
Unless I'm missing something, I
don't
think this is correct.
Plugins/bundles should _always_
follow
the strict versioning rules outlined in
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering
So a change from 1.0 to 2.0 would
mean
"breaking API changes".
I'm pretty sure that's not the case
(especially, if you don't have API, I don't see how you could break
them
:)
and certainly would not be each and
every bundle?!
Each bundle needs to be versioned
according
to the changes going into it ... there would never be a "mass update"
of bundle versions.
Features, on the other hand, we've
decided
can be a bit looser since they are not really a runtime construct, so
they
could be 2.0 ... eventually ...
But, I would strongly suggest not
changing
the features until we are further along ... there's still time enough
you
might decide not to call it "2.0" after all,
and it is impossible to "go
backwards"
with versions.
So ... am I missing something? Or
does
this need to be corrected before our first milestone this week?
I'm sure there might be valid
reasons
for it ... but, I'd be surprised, since I haven't heard about them.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
|
