I have moved JSF to version 1.0.
For WST and JST, my preference is to
follow the guideline and stick to 1.6. 2.0 sets the wrong expectation of major
changes in those projects.
Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 10:54
Subject: [wtp-dev] What to do
about feature version numbers?
Many of our WST and JST features are still versioned
1.6, which is what we bumped
right after 1.5 was released.
thinking is that the WST and JST features should be versioned 2.0, to match
does not technically match the guidelines put forth in
would recommend a bit closer relation to the type of change in contained
the feature version ... which means we should leave our features at 1.6.
seems to me, though, that users looking at a list of installed features would
to match 2.0. In other words, seems to me, the JST and WST features are more
a "marketing number" related to the major yearly release, rather than
a runtime constraint
the plugin versioning is.
do others think? 1.6? 2.0? Don't care?
I do think the JPA and JSF features should be 1.0, since this is the first year