Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-dev] Our last minute plans for JEM code in our M5

Just to follow up ... I did get JEM building from CVS, so would appreciate everyone checking/testing the latest M5 build at

Especially, make sure we didn't regress on 169609 JEM Reflection results in endless loop. That is, that I correctly applied
the patch, etc. which started this whole thing.

I'm still looking into the 1.x to 2.x version change, to see if feasible, but please don't wait for it to verify this latest build.


David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/19/2007 03:31 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."        <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[wtp-dev] Our last minute plans for JEM code in our M5

I'd like to start actually building the JEM code to include in our M5 (instead of the current patched version we have).

So, I'll try that this afternoon, and if our WTP JUnits pass, I'll ask teams that depend on JEM to do a quick sanity check to be
sure nothing is amiss.

Further, assuming that first step goes ok, I'd actually like to bump up our JEM versions to the planned "2.0.0" to get in to M5.
This will cause us a little more pain now, but I think any adopters that also use/depend on JEM can more easily adjust using the M5 code
in a form that's closer to final form, where as if we bump up after M5, for M6, that's getting pretty late in the cycle for a major version increase.

The version increase is pretty mechanical, but it effects about 100 of our bundle manifests, so everyone will need to make sure their
HEAD code matches what has been released (or, we'll have to do some funny temp branches).

Note: besides WST and JST, the potential version change also effects JSF.

I'll send out follow up notes to wtp-releng if/when teams need to test and/or increase version constrain ranges.

Let me know if anyone has any concerns with this plan.


wtp-dev mailing list

Back to the top