Hi Arthur,
In practice, more than 1 and typically 3
of the PMC members review and vote on the bug.
Thanks
Raghu
From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006
2:58 PM
To: General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.;
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Request PMC
approvals for J2EE defects
John,
Thx
for the reference. I hope this doesn't mean that in practice fixes will only
get one PMC member looking at them.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
John Lanuti
<jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 05:27 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
>From David on 10/03/2006
"This morning the PMC agreed to make official something that had become
something of a defacto standard ...
committers can release a proposed fix, based on 1 positive review, as long as
they are prepared to modify it
or retract it, if other PMC members had concerns. This is to help reduce
"bottlenecks" and get it into a build quickly,
so it can be even better regression tested. "
John Lanuti
Software Engineer, IBM Rational
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
t/l 441-7861
|
"Konstantin
Komissarchik" <kosta@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 05:18 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
David should correct my memory, but the way I remember the policy being stated
in the last several dev meetings is... a fix can be released with only one PMC
member approving, but the committer should be ready to rollback if other PMC
members object when they get a chance to review. Whether that’s a good
policy or not is a separate question.
- Konstantin
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:12 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues.
Cc: General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues.; wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE defects
Chuck,
I think it depends on where we are in the cycle. If we are approaching a
deadline then we need rapid response. However, as far as I understand, we still
require 3 +1 votes. The note requesting approval is timestamped 10/09/2006
03:16 PM and when I reviewed the bugs, far less than 24 hours had elapsed. I
think 48 hours is reasonable for business as usual. In my case, yesterday was a
holiday in Canada
so I didn't see the request until this morning. Also, some PMC members were
travelling to the Eclipse Summit today. Let's give people a fair chance to
comment on the bugs before they are released.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
Chuck Bridgham
<cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 04:28 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
Well we were told we could release because in the past getting 3 votes wasn't
timely....
Maybe some clarification is needed.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)
|
Arthur Ryman
<ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 04:18 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
Chuck,
I've been reviewing these bugs and noticed that they are being released based
on a single vote from David. I thought we required 3 votes. Has the process
changed?
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
Chuck Bridgham
<cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/09/2006 03:16 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
The J2EE Team here in RTP has several defect ready for PMC review:
158619 maj P2
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC performance
[project creation] Need default setting for java
output f...
158623 cri P1
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[performance] ComponentDeployable members() to
recognize ...
158825 cri P1
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
wst.comm 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[emfWorkbench] Use of EMF2DOMAdapterImpl now requires OSGI
159026 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx tjbishop@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[hotbug][j2ee] 'EAR Libraries' does not include JAR files...
159158 cri P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[j2ee] InvertClientJARDependencyCompoundOperation throwin...
159160 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx deboer@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[import/export] J2EE module import adds invalid reference
160019 maj P2
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC performance
[modulecore] Problem with DependencyGraph timestamp checking
160226 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[modulecore] VirtualComponent: Concurrent Modification Ex...
links are below:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158619
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158623
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158825
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159026
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159158
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159160
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160019
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160226
Each defect has an explaination of the problem for justification, and also a
detailed explaination of the fix involved.
These defects/patches have already undergone internal review and testing, and
we'll be glad to provide any additional details if required.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with
any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems,
Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential,
proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the
use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not
the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please
immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
