[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs
|
Is it
incorrect to mark a bug VERIFIED against yesterday's 1.5.x build when the
bug is targeted to the 1.0.x stream? Should I verify with both a 1.0.x
build AND a 1.5.x build?
Thanks,
- Ian
Raghu,
Thx.
Please mark it as VERIFIED since you are acting as the reporter. Let the bug
owner CLOSE it.
Arthur
Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog:
http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL
969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920,
TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
"raghunathan srinivasan"
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/22/2006 01:36 PM
|
Please respond
to
"raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx"
<raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond
to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural
issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "General discussion of
project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these
worst fixed bugs |
|
Hi,
The JSF Tools
project would like to help in verifying the bugs. We will pick the
blocker/critical bugs in a component (jst.j2ee) and put the tag,
Verifying in the Status Whiteboard to flag the bugs we are working on. I am
assuming we can mark the bug as closed once we successfully verify the
bug.
Suggestions / objections?
-Raghu
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M
Williams
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 6:43 AM
To:
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst
fixed bugs
Component Leads,
These is the query, by component, for blocker, critical, and major
bugs marked as "fixed" ... these are the most important to verify by Tuesday.
Please don't wait for the "originator" for these, we need someone ...
anyone .... to verify that they really are fixed.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_severity&y_axis_field=component&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=WebTools&product=Web+Tools&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&format=table&action="">
Reminder: bugs in the REMIND or LATER state should not be verified
... those are "holding" states. .... Well, I guess even "remind" could be
closed if over 6 months old, or so.
I did not include dup's,
worksforme, or invalid in above query simply because these "fixed" ones are
most important. Feel free to also verify dup's, worksforme, and invalid
resolutions after 'fixed' ones.
|
|
Severity
|
| Component
|
|
| blocker
| critical
| major
| Total
|
|
J2EE Standard
Tools
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
Web Standard
Tools
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
documentation
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
jst.ejb
|
|
|
|
|
|
jst.j2ee
|
|
|
|
|
|
jst.jsp
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
jst.server
|
|
|
|
|
|
jst.servlet
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
jst.ws
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
releng
|
|
|
|
|
|
website
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
wst.common
|
|
|
|
|
|
wst.css
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
wst.dtd
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
|
wst.html
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.internet
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
wst.rdb
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.server
|
|
|
|
|
|
wst.sse
|
.
|
.
|
|
|
|
wst.validation
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.web
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.ws
|
|
|
|
|
|
wst.wsdl
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.xml
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
wst.xsd
|
.
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing
list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
