[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Criteria for WTP 1.0.3 approval -- and 1.0.3 builds
|
Jeffrey's note reminds me to clarify
status of 1.0.3 builds ... because last week, I said this week, and
now this week, I'd like to say next week.
I've check with some "prime adopters"
and they thought this fine, if this effects anyone I'm not aware of please
let me know.
And, committers ... even after the 3
vote approval, please use care releasing as we will want to following "versioning
rules" carefully.
That is, the first time something is
released to a plugin for 1.0.3, its version's service number should be
bumped up by one.
Plus, we do not yet, have a good "automatic"
solution for incrementing effected feature version qualifiers, and in the
worst case, will have
to do so "manually", by tagging/releasing
the cvs version of effected features ... both so the features service number
is changed the first time
one of its contained plugins change,
and from then on, change it qualifier (cvs version tag) when ever on of
its contained plugins change).
So, if you are the first to release
a fix to a plugin, you should up the version's service number, AND, I suggest,
make a note
in the bug that you have done so, (and
what version was, and what you changed it to) so there will be trace of
it, in case that makes it easier to manage this.
The end-goal of all this care in versioning
is so that, in principle, someone could "pick up" any build and
update a current install with it,
and all the right versions would be
installed, and right ones picked at run time.
Thanks,
Jeffrey Liu <jeffliu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/10/2006 05:23 PM
|
Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "General discussion of project-wide
or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [wtp-dev] Criteria for WTP 1.0.3 approval |
|
Hi,
Just a reminder to everyone that the criteria for WTP 1.0.3 approval is
3 or more positive votes and no negative votes. All fixes must meet this
criteria before they can be released to the WTP 1.0.3 build. I've created
a Web page [1] that shows you which bugs were approved:
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/plans/1.0.3/ramp-down-bugs-approval.html
Thanks,
Jeffrey Liu
IBM Rational Software
IBM Toronto Lab.
8200 Warden Ave. Markham, Ontario, L6G 1C7
Internal mail: D3/UMZ/8200/MKM (D3-268)
T/L: 969 3531
Tel: (905) 413 3531
Fax: (905) 413 4920
jeffliu@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
