[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approval for 139863 for 1.0.3 | 
Hi Konstantin, the version cannot be detected on MacOS because the of  
the implementation of MacOSXVMInstall does not override the null  
returning abstract impl of getJavaVersion().  This is fixed in 3.2.   
As far as JRockit, it could be that you need to provide a custom VM  
Type and implementation of IVMInstall.
- sachin
On May 3, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
A bit more background on this issue...
We rely on being able to accurately determine the version of the  
java vm of the server runtime in order to control which versions of  
the java facet the user should be able to select. For instance if  
the VM version is 1.4, the user can select java facet version 1.3  
and 1.4. Unfortunately, there are cases (as of yet not understood)  
where JDT fails to determine the VM version. This behavior has been  
seen on Mac OS (not sure which VM) and it has recently started  
showing up sporadically with BEA’s JRockit VM. The current code  
arbitrarily assigns version 1.4 to the VM when the version cannot  
be determined. The problem with that is that if the actual version  
happens to be 5.0 the user cannot pick version 5.0 of java facet  
(and hence the corresponding java compiler level). There is no  
workaround. It is going to take some time to understand exactly why  
version detection fails and to forward that information to the JDT  
team. In the meantime we can make this problem less severe by using  
the highest known VM version (5.0 in the case of 1.0.x) instead of  
1.4. This approach places the least restriction on the user. With  
this approach, the user will always be able to compensate for the  
VM version detection problem by picking the correct version of the  
java facet on the facets selection screen. While not perfect, it’s  
much better than what we currently have and I highly recommend that  
we make this fix for 1.0.3.
Does anyone have any comments on this?
- Konstantin
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev- 
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:34 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approval for 139863 for 1.0.3
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=139863 for details.
This bug covers improving our workaround for the case where java vm  
cannot be detected. The current behavior is rather bad for people  
who hit it and the fix is pretty safe.
- Konstantin
______________________________________________________________________ 
_ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may  
contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and  
affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,  
copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for  
the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you  
are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in  
error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.  
______________________________________________________________________ 
_ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may  
contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and  
affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,  
copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for  
the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you  
are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in  
error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.  
______________________________________________________________________ 
_ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may  
contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and  
affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,  
copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for  
the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you  
are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in  
error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev