I have prepared one in its usual place[1] (I believe web site reorg did
not affect it). The new¬eworthy for server tools is already in
there. Any components that wants to add their N&N please send me a
note when you are ready so that I can arrange the links.
[1]http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/news/1.0M8.html
David M Williams wrote:
Feel free to publish one and/or get
it started. I didn't mean to leave out anyone/anything.
Its a good idea for us to always
have
one, I just haven't had the time to think about it.
A few other teams have mentioned to
me they'd have tiny bits to put in one, but
AFAIK, know one's started one.
Thanks
for volunteering :)
Gorkem
Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx>
Sent by:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/27/2005 04:30 AM
|
Please
respond to
Gorkem Ercan and "General discussion of project-wide or architectural
issues."
|
|
|
To
|
"General
discussion
of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re:
[wtp-dev] M8 Declared:
1.0M8 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 -- 08:40 (+0300) |
|
Does this mean no new & noteworthy for M8? I
had
a couple of minor
enhancements I wanted to publicize and we also have the new Oracle
server adapter in M8. I guess these will have to wait M9 :)
--
Gorkem Ercan
On 9/23/05, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/
>
> or
>
>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/S-1.0M8-200509230840/
>
> While there is no new function per se in this milestone, there is
progress
> in declaring API
> and 125 bugs were fixed.
>
>
>
> Just so everyone knows the same information:
>
> Of the 4 "bad bugs" identified at 9/22 status meeting,
>
> two were fixed in this final build
>
> 110265 blo P1 1.0 M8 IVirtualFile.exist() returns incorrect value
> 108671 cri P3 1.0 M8 "Error trying to set new file into editor"
error
> message under WST project
>
>
> and two were not. But the teams involved decided that while these
are
> serious for some
> specific cases, would not hender adoption of M8 by users or
adopters
in
> general.
> (End users should never see these, if other adopters do -- besides
the one
> adopter we know about
> who open the bug :)
> please let us know, or comment in the bugzillas, so in future we
are
better
> aware of impacts to others).
>
> 110229 blo P3 1.0 M8 NoClassDefFoundError for URIResolverPlugin
class
in
> headless mode
> 109758 blo P2 1.0 M9 trying to get ejb artifact edit hangs
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
|
