Re: [wtp-dev] Looking for committer with an interest in server-side unit

[snpe <snpe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

David,
  It is simple;maybe 'WTP isn't provifding server side java code', but help
make servlets,EJBs,taglibs filters - cactus test this artifacts

regards
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 11:49 pm, David M Williams wrote:
> Dan, I confess my ignorance (too) and ask ... what's the benefit to WTP? 
> >From the Apache Cactus website, "Cactus is a simple test framework for 
> unit testing server-side java code (Servlets, EJBs, Tag Libs, Filters, 
> ...). ". 
> While this is a great thing, WTP isn't providing "server side java code" 
> per se, are we? 
> So ... just wondering ... (I suspect you've explained this before/else 
> where and I've lost track). 
> Thanks. (And, please, interpret the questions as interest, not resistance 
> :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Timothy Deboer <deboer@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 05/11/2005 07:21 PM
> Please respond to
> "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
> 
> 
> To
> "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." 
> <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: [wtp-dev] Looking for committer with an interest in server-side unit 
> testing and a big heart
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Dan, 
> 
> I'm the most likely candidate to adopt this code, and was going to respond 
> back to your earlier note. I think the code looks good and ready to go, I 
> just have a couple minor concerns that hopefully will be easy to resolve. 
> The first is that I have a passing familiarity with Cactus, but I'm 
> definitely not an expert. I was hoping the community would chime in with 
> feedback or even a "hey, that'd be great!". I'd like to get at least one 
> other person who is familiar with Cactus to give this a try and give a 
> thumbs-up. If nobody else offers, maybe one of the other guys at BEA? 
> 
> Second, I don't have the resource to do anything more than review & commit 
> code, answer questions, etc. I doubt this is an issue, but I just need to 
> be clear that I'm expecting you to maintain the code with cleanup, general 
> release polishing, and fixing bugs. 
> 
> We can take the rest of this offline and hopefully get the code in soon! 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Tim deBoer
> WebSphere Tools - IBM Canada Ltd.
> (905) 413-3503  (tieline 969)
> deboer@xxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
> "Daniel Somerfield" <dsomerfi@xxxxxxx> 
> Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 05/11/2005 02:02 PM 
> 
> Please respond to
> "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
> 
> 
> To
> "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." 
> <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> cc
> 
> Subject
> [wtp-dev] Looking for committer with an interest in server-side unit 
> testing and a big heart
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi everyone, 
> I am still in the market for a committer to adopt the cactus code. I would 
> love to see it get into 1.0. It is functional and has a very nice README 
> if you would like to try it out. I do need to take a few minutes to move 
> it into internal packages but I am holding off until I know where this is 
> going to be packaged and whether it is going to be in its own plug-in or 
> part of another. 
> So be kind. Support server-side testing and adopt this poor lonely plug-in 
> that needs a home. 
> Thanks, 
> Dan 
>  _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
> 
>