| Re: [wakaama-dev] registration list of object and instances |
|
Indeed. Single instance objects must declare the “0” instance anyway. This is an easy fix for current objects. I’m on it. Regards, David Navarro From: wakaama-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wakaama-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kraus Achim (INST/ESY4) Hi all, The current implementation of the test client cause an issue in the registration. According LWM2M TS, 5.2.1, objects are listed as “/<oid>“ and already available object instances as “/<oid>/<iid>”. But the current test client implementation for “single” objects mislead the “getRegisterPayload” function to interpret the empty “instanceList” as “no available instances”. This results in objects: /1/0, /3, /4, /5, /6, /1024/10, /1024/11, /1024/12, instead objects: /1/0, /3/0, /4/0, /5/0, /6/0, /1024/10, /1024/11, /1024/12, So, are there any points against using instances also for “single” objects to fix the registration payload? Or are there different interpretation of the register specification? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Achim Kraus Bosch Software Innovations GmbH Communications (INST/ESY4) Stuttgarter Straße 130 71332 Waiblingen GERMANY Registered office: Berlin, Register court: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 148411 B Executives: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach; Michael Hahn --------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for |