| Sorry that I'm coming late to this party... 
 FWIW, I totally love the idea of naming your releases. My preference
    would be go with something fun/funny (comedian names, Dr. Seuss
    words?); but fun/funny is actually a pretty hard problem.
 
 Talk of projects releasing different parts of their code on
    different schedules raises a bit of a red flag with me. I assume
    that issues regarding version mismatches between runtime and tools
    have been considered. Is there concern that differences between
    runtime and tools version numbers may cause confusion in the
    community?
 
 Our processes really only have a concept of a project and a release.
    There really is no concept of parts of a project doing a release.
    This isn't a show stopper; it just means that we may need to be
    creative with the process to make sure that the intent is clear. We
    may need to work together to make sure we get this right. Keep in
    mind that anything you call a "release" (other than service
    releases) requires a release review...
 
 Again, I assume that these sorts of issues are being considered, I
    just haven't been paying close enough attention to this
    conversation.
 
 Wayne
 
 On 06/17/2011 10:13 AM, Glyn Normington wrote:
 
      
      Kudos to Steve Powell for coming up with
      the idea. He also suggests not being too "grand" near the start.
      
 e.g. Birds: Argus, Bantam, Canary, ... 
 Some more ideas if needed... 
 Elements: Antimony, Beryllium, Carbon, ... Cars: Avant, Boxter, Carrera,  ... Trees: Alder, Birch, Cedar, ... Mountains: Altai, Balkan, Cascade, ... Colours: Azure, Bisque, Cerise, ... Grapes: Aramon, Bovale, Centurian, ... Islands: Aero, Batan, Capri, ... Stars: Algol, Betelgeuse, Cygnus, ... 
 Any more ideas or preferences? 
        
        
        
          On 15 Jun 2011, at 11:22, Kapukaranov, Borislav wrote: 
              
                
                  What a great idea!  Release branding will certainly add a nice
                      touch to the personality and popularity of a
                      release.      We’ll have to find an area that has good
                      variety of names and won’t clash with Eclipse’s
                      branding.  Animals are obviously good because of the
                      great variety – we can take birds for example,
                      obviously cats are already taken J
                     A bird with ‘A’ is the Great Argus, which
                      is also known as Phoenix in some Asian areas,
                      which is kind of symbolic considering the dm
                      server and Virgo relation. J
                         Anyway there surely are many more options
                      and it would be interesting to see other
                      suggestions.      Best Regards  Bobby          Past releases of Virgo have consisted of two or
                    three deliverables all at the same version number.
                    This is likely to be true for the next release.  
                    However, in the future, we anticipate releasing
                      runtime and tooling together, a bit like a mini
                      release train. At that point, not all the
                      deliverables will have the same version number. In
                      fact, we want the freedom to be able to rev the
                      runtime and tooling independently of each other.
                      So in the future, release branding may become
                      important.  
                    Release branding is also a useful marketing
                      device. If we chose the right release brands, they
                      could create some "buzz" in the community. It is
                      also handy for future releases so we can refer to
                      them before we've settled on the version numbers.
                     
                    Would it therefore make sense to adopt branding
                      for the 3.0 release so that the community gets
                      used to a release brand?  
                    Examples of release branding are Eclipse and
                      Ubuntu with its alphabetically sequenced release
                      brands (based on animals in the case of Ubuntu),
                      Mac OS (more animals).  
                    Counter-examples are Java (unless "Java 6" is
                      counted as a release brand for 1.6) and Tomcat.  
                    I guess a Virgo release brand would get a
                      little messy if and when Virgo joins the Eclipse
                      release train as both brands would then apply to
                      the release. But we would expect also to release
                      independently of the release train, so there would
                      be quite a confusing sequence.  
                    An alternative to release branding is just to
                      stick with the kernel version number as the
                      "headline" version for a release with other
                      components such as tooling free to have a
                      different version number.  
                    What do you think? If you favour release
                      branding, do you have suggestions for the actual
                      brands?  
                _______________________________________________ 
                virgo-dev mailing list
                virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
                https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev 
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev |