+1
On 17 Dec 2010, at 16:59, Dmitry Sklyut wrote: In that case how about 1.0.0.M01?
0.9.0 means a lot of changes in the tests and manifests and plans.
I will set-up documentation project and this will keep version stable. How about it?
Thanks Dmitry On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dmitry
Of course I forgot to mention the obvious. If we want to release snaps, snaps must go through a release review.
The alternative, if you simply want to get binaries out there, is to ship (don't use the 'r' word) a milestone such as 0.9.0.M01.
On 17 Dec 2010, at 14:45, Dmitry Sklyut wrote: Agree. Bad boy is to be versioned with 0.9.0.RELEASE until documentation comes online.
I just really think it is time for snaps to have a binary release and not force users to build from sources.
Hmmm... What about 0.9.0.RELESE-BAD-BOY. Would be a valid OSGi qualifier. :) On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Snaps is not production ready as it doesn't have any documentation, e.g. to describe the limitations. ;-)
On 17 Dec 2010, at 14:39, Christopher Frost wrote:
Hi,
Well, seeing as it's still just a bad boy and not a bad man yet, how
about 0.9.0.RELEASE
Unless you feel he's production ready?
Chris.
On 17/12/2010 14:26, Dmitry Sklyut wrote:
I am almost there. Just wondering what version to
release that bad boy with?
1.0.0.RELEASE?
2.1.0.RELEASE?
Regards,
Dmitry
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:27 AM,
Christopher Frost <frostc@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes, this should be
easy enough.
Your welcome to do this yourself Dmitry. Once you have
stuck you ssh keys on the eclipse servers, git/build and
build as the virgoBuild user. You will be able to do a
release, the procedure for releasing a single repo is on
the wiki, bottom of the build tab.
I'm happy to do it as well though, raise a bug if you
like.
Chris.
On 16/12/2010 08:35, Glyn Normington wrote:
Hi Dmitry
Yes, tag away!
We have weaned ourselves off publishing to zodiac since non-SpringSource committers cannot be given our S3 keys. I'll leave it to Chris, our build meister, to discuss the remaining options...
Regards,
Glyn
On 15 Dec 2010, at 18:59, Dmitry Sklyut wrote:
Hi All,
Do you think it is time to take a snapshot of snaps and tag it as compatible with 2.1.0.RELEASE?
It would be great also if snaps got published to some maven/ivy repo. Right now I can't find it in zodiac.
Building it from source is getting to be a bit cumbersome :)
Regards,
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
_______________________________________________
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
virgo-dev mailing list
virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
|
