On 09/27/2016 06:37 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
It's not so much about the review vs pr workflow - although Gerrit is kind of an alien to a majority of Git users compared to GitHub. This really is about visualization. Neither cgit nor Gerrit offer anything near the capabilities of browsing
and visualizing content. I see this as a critical feature.
That's a solid argument.
If we want published content with Gerrit, it means we have to deploy the content to
, have a whole dedicated site, deliver HTML/CSS.
If we go on GitHub, then content is presented nicely and browseable "for free", we deliver markdown and asciidoc.
GitHub seems to provide us a better "time to market" than Gerrit.