On 09/27/2016 06:37 PM, Gunnar
It's not so much about the
review vs pr workflow - although Gerrit is kind
of an alien to a majority of Git users compared
to GitHub. This really is about visualization.
Neither cgit nor Gerrit offer anything near the
capabilities of browsing and visualizing
content. I see this as a critical feature.
That's a solid argument.
If we want published content with Gerrit, it means
we have to deploy the content to
, have a whole
dedicated site, deliver HTML/CSS.
If we go on GitHub, then content is presented nicely
and browseable "for free", we deliver markdown and
GitHub seems to provide us a better "time to market"