[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] EclipseCon panel
|
Title: Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] EclipseCon panel
Yep,
It can be found here:
https://eclipsecon.greenmeetingsystems.com/submissions/view/130
Bob
On 11/15/07 12:26 PM, "Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bob,
Have you submitted the proposal yet?
Mik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ui-
> best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob
> Fraser
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:38 AM
> To: UI Best Practices Working Group
> Cc: 'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'
> Subject: Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] EclipseCon panel
>
> I would be most happy to lead the panel. I will get the proposal
> started.
>
>
> On 11/13/07 8:27 AM, "Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Given recent dialog, I'm pretty sure that we have learned how to be
> > controversial :) All we need is someone to argue that UI Best
> Practices
> > should be policed and that violators have their mouse hand chopped
> off.
> >
> > Kidding aside, I think this means that we would need to invite
> someone with
> > a good incentive for the project UIs to have their consistency and
> quality
> > enforced. I nominate Mike M. and or Bjorn. I may even be willing to
> take
> > their side of the argument now and then ;)
> >
> > It sounds like we could have a good topic for a panel, because there
> is
> > enough controversy, and there is good reason to raise awareness of
> the
> > guidelines for attendees, who may not be aware of this very valuable
> > resource and efforts around it. How about this for a panel
> structure?
> >
> > * Platform UI representative(s): Kevin, others (?)
> > * IBM and visual design representative: Kimberley (?)
> > * Developer trying to follow in their footsteps and encountering
> problems
> > along the way: Mik
> > * Manager being unreasonable in expecting UI consistency from
> projects: Mike
> > and/or Bjorn (?)
> > * Vendor trying to figure out whether they should care about any of
> this:
> > (?)
> > * others?
> >
> > Bob: are you interested in leading the panel again?
> >
> > Mik
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ui-
> >> best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff,
> >> Doug
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:06 AM
> >> To: User Interface Architecture Working Group
> >> Subject: RE: [ui-best-practices-working-group] EclipseCon panel
> >>
> >> Speaking as the Program Chair, I suggest that you make this somewhat
> >> controversial to keep it interesting. Several of the panels last
> year
> >> were boring because everyone was saying the same thing. (I missed
> your
> >> panel, so I'm not specifically talking about yours.)
> >>
> >> UI's are controversial by definition because users have different
> >> definitions of usability based on their domain expertise. We get a
> lot
> >> of customer feedback on Eclipse along the lines of "it's too big and
> >> too
> >> complicated for what I need to do." It would be great to
> incorporate
> >> that in a UI panel.
> >>
> >> Doug Gaff
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ui-
> >>> best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Kevin
> >>> McGuire
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:15 AM
> >>> To: User Interface Architecture Working Group
> >>> Subject: Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] EclipseCon panel
> >>>
> >>> I was thinking about this too. It'd be cool to do it again, we had
> a
> >>> good turnout and it in general its probably good to take all
> >>> opportunities to get people thinking about UI stuff. It might be
> >> good
> >>> though to have a few less people.
> >>>
> >>> The big question to me though is, to what aim? What will be the
> >>> purpose? It may be better if we had a stronger theme, or even set
> up
> >>> some more contentious points to have a good panel discussion of
> >>> opposing
> >>> views.
> >>>
> >>> So before I say yes I'd like us to get an idea of the theme.
> >>>
> >>> Kevin
> >>>
> >>> Mik Kersten wrote:
> >>>> Is there interest in doing a panel like last year's?
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mik
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mik Kersten
> >>>> Project Lead, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
> >>>> ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-
> working-
> >>> group
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
> >>> ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-
> >>> group
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
> >> ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-
> >> group
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
> > ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-
> group
>
>
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately
> return this by email and then delete it.
> _______________________________________________
> ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
> ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-
> group
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
