[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| Re: [udig-users] GeoDB file Data Formats and uDIG | 
Hi Shawn,
For uDig 1.1.x the options are not the best.  There is a HSQL  
datastore but it does not have indexing and hasn't got a lot of bug  
fixes so that is not a good option.  The postgis is the best but I  
imagine that you want something a little more light-weight.  GML is  
not good because it is more of a interchange format and would be very  
slow for editing or even zooming in/out.
I believe the plan is to use the H2 datastore on trunk.
Jesse
On 14-May-08, at 6:47 AM, Shaun Kolomeitz wrote:
Dear fellow uDIG users,
I've had no luck from the uDIG devel list so I thought I'd see if  
users
could maybe provide some advice or pointers on an issue I am trying to
resolve.
I'm in the final stages of investigating the options for using an open
source GIS product for over 600 clients. The options are now uDIG,  
QIS,
gvSIG. uDIG has some appeal being a Java custom client over a C++/C#
client.
Really we're only after a basic map interface with a lot of custom
dynamic forms to capture data, print maps and reports (PDFs). Not  
rocket
science by any means.
I'm pretty happy with the way uDIG is progressing and the features  
that
you get "out of the box".
In the back end however I am wondering what format will help us to
manage a file-based geodatabase type structure ?
I am after a structure similar to shapefiles with "related" DBF's, and
unfortunately we cannot have PostGIS running, just a set of files.
Will GML "do it for us" ?
The Shapefile format doesn't cut it for us because we have a need for
long-text (memo) fields and one to many relationships in the data.
Can anyone suggest a format that we should look at (or is anything on
the horizon like SQLite spatial, H2, HSQL ???) ? I notice that  
GeoServer
uses a H2/Java db for the EPSG tables, but can you do a similar thing
for uDIG ?
I've also got a much larger spec for the system if anyone is  
interested
in discussing what we require and what might be suitable.
Any ideas greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Shaun Kolomeitz,
Senior Technical Officer
Business and Asset Services
Queensland Parks and Wildlife Division
Environmental Protection Agency
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Think B4U Print
1 ream of paper = 6% of a tree and 5.4kg CO2 in the atmosphere
3 sheets of A4 paper = 1 litre of water
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
_________________________
Disclaimer
WARNING: This e-mail (including any attachments) has originated from  
a Queensland Government department and may contain information that  
is confidential, private, or covered by legal professional  
privilege, and may be protected by copyright.
You may use this e-mail only if you are the person(s) it was  
intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way.  No  
one is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose,  
distribute, print or copy this e-mail without appropriate  
authority.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please inform  
the sender immediately by phone or e-mail and delete this e-mail,  
including any copies, from your computer system network and destroy  
any hardcopies.
Unless otherwise stated, this e-mail represents the views of the  
sender and not the views of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Although this e-mail has been checked for the presence of computer  
viruses, the Environmental Protection Agency provides no warranty  
that all viruses have been detected and cleaned. Any use of this e- 
mail could harm your computer system.  It is your responsibility to  
ensure that this e-mail does not contain and is not affected by  
computer viruses, defects or interference by third parties or  
replication problems (including incompatibility with your computer  
system).
E-mails sent to and from the Environmental Protection Agency will be  
electronically stored, managed and may be audited, in accordance  
with the law and Queensland Government Information Standards (IS31,  
IS38, IS40, IS41 and IS42) to the extent they are consistent with  
the law.
___________________________
!DEPTSTAMP1!
_______________________________________________
udig-users mailing list
udig-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-users