[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] Introducing the CNF to the SDK
|
Indeed Andrea:
I am not very pleased; we did discuss a couple weeks ago this issue on IRC.
The result of which is that the last 1.2.0 RC2 is tagged; and represents our best starting place for a 1.2.x branch.
There was a small number of problems with 1.2.0 RC2 preventing it from being great.
- H2 database was getting stuck for max and linux users (now fixed!)
- Missing a "What is New" documentation page
- missing linux 64 jre (now fixed?)
- missing a mac installer
I am not going to be able to return to the topic myself until next month; as such I have not been pestering anyone about a 1.2.0 timeframe.
I suspect we will choose to branch from RC2 and port across select patches from trunk.
Jody
On 20/04/2010, at 7:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> You are correct - the RC process has failed as the PSC was not able to
>> get 1.2.0 out in time.
>
> I know I'm not PSC or even developer, but what's wrong is just noticing
> the RC phase has started, branching, and leaving trunk for wild new
> developments while the branch is used for bug fixes until release?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> --
> Andrea Aime
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
