Re: [udig-devel] An installer for OSX to try out

["andrea antonello" <andrea.antonello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ouch, sorry, didn't take that into consideration. It should work from
commandline I guess, but no way to get it out in a linux machine.

What a pitty, but I agree,
Andrea

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Jesse Eichar <jeichar.w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The problem with this is it requires OSX to build.  As it is we need WINE to
> build the windows version.  With this we can only build on a mac with
> Darwine installed.  That means Automated builds would be basically
> impossible.
>
>  So I think that strikes that option out.
>
>
>  Just had a second thought.  We could make uDig install the JAI libraries if
> required.  That would eliminate the requirement for the installer as well.
> That is quite tempting...
>
>
>  Jesse
>
>
>
>
>  On 30-Apr-08, at 9:30 AM, andrea antonello wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I gave the packagemaker a try, and wow, that is an easy and clean one.
> > Please find attached the configuration file for my test.
> >
> > It supports all the needed branding and licensing and whatever.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > What you could try is setting up a eclipse plug-in to hold the classpath
> > > based install of JAI / ImageIO extention / ImageIO-ext stuff.
> > >
> > > In for a penny in for a pound ... and this problem has pounded me
> > > previously.
> > >
> >
> > I also played around with this, but it sometimes gains inconsostency.
> > If there is already the package in the classpath, things tend to go
> > mad. I think the extention folder is the way to go.
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Jody
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29-Apr-08, at 9:13 PM, Tore Halset wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just tried the installer. It worked, but I have some comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do we need an installer on OS X? Does the installer need to
> install
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > something in some other place? I am pretty happy about download a zip or
> dmg
> > > and just drag the application to where I want it. And then just delete
> > > application when I want to remove it.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Does JAI stuff need to be installed in .../Java/Extensions? I think
> it
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > would be cleaner to keep it inside the uDig directory and alter the
> > > classpath or whatever to include it.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In the "Select Installation Packages" view, I clicked one of the 3
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > lines. It worked, but is was kind of non-macish that the small window
> with
> > > the 3 lines got even smaller. See the attached screenshot.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess my description for the JAI/Image IO is too long.  I agree that
> is
> > > >
> > > a really ugly effect.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> > > > http://udig.refractions.net
> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> > > http://udig.refractions.net
> > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
> > >
> > >
> >
> <udig_packagemaker.pmdoc.zip>_______________________________________________
> >
> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> > http://udig.refractions.net
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
> >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>  http://udig.refractions.net
>  http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>