Re: [udig-devel] WFSDataStore.getCapabilities() vs getInfo proposal

[Gabriel Roldán <groldan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The proposal makes a lot of sense to me.
Get a community +1 from here.

cheers,

Gabriel
On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:54:16 pm Jody Garnett wrote:
> I did not know Gabriel was waiting for this kind of thing; as such I
> would like to open up voting on:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Introduction+of+getInfo
>
> Jody
>
> > Previously we could getCapabilities() from a UDIGWFSDataStore; looks
> > like gabriel has made a WFSDataStore interface that provides a summary
> > of the information in a capabilities document. Makes sense since WFS
> > 1.0 and WFS 1.1 probably have different content?
> >
> > interface WFSDataStore {
> >  getAbstract()
> >  getAbstract(typeName)
> >  getKeywords()
> >  getLatLonBoundingBox(String)
> >  getTitle()
> >  getTitle(typeName)
> > }
> >
> > Gabriel before you go any further down this route please review the
> > proposal here:
> > - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Introduction+of+getInfo
> >
> > We have 100% overlap here.
> >
> > Also note that we will need to make the FilterCapabilities data
> > structure available at some point.
> >
> > Jody
> > _______________________________________________
> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> > http://udig.refractions.net
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> !DSPAM:4045,478fdcab102795219720167!