What is the reason you are not considering testNG. Just curious.
Pros of RCPTT - readability of the test
script, recorder, clear separation of setup vs tests
Cons of RCPTT - slow execution of the tests (it takes time for the
tool to assemble the AUT), no documented way to run the tests from
the workspace where you are developing your code, assertions can
only be done on objects reachable from the UI
Pros of SWTBot - all java based, runs directly from the IDE, can
tests UI and Java model
Cons of SWTBot - tests are hard to produce and read, they appeared
to be more brittle
Overall I think they both cover a different use case. SWTBot is
really neat for unit testing (e.g test a view, an editor, a
dialog), whereas RCPTT is best suited for integration tests.
HTH
On 15-10-23 02:27 PM, Eugene Kondrashev wrote:
Appreciate your comment much.
I was looking into swtbot as a result of early research.
Are there any difference between swtbot and rcptt? I was
trying to find comparison between those two, but failed to
find any reasonable pros/cons arguments.
_______________________________________________
tycho-user mailing list
tycho-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tycho-user
|
