Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tycho-user] Debugging Reproducible Version Qualifiers

> Turns out I had put multiple <url> tags into a single <repository> tag instead of using multiple <repository> tags each with its own <url>.

If you have an example and you think it would have helped if Tycho was more explicit about the error, open an enhancement request.

Regards,
Jan



From: tycho-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tycho-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Irene Wang
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014 14:37
To: tycho-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tycho-user] Debugging Reproducible Version Qualifiers

Hi all,

Of course, all it took to solve my problem was to write the mailing list. :) Turns out I had put multiple <url> tags into a single <repository> tag instead of using multiple <repository> tags each with its own <url>.

Thanks anyway!

Irene

--
Irene Wang
Build Manager
Email iwang@xxxxxxxxxx
Talend SA | 9, rue Pages - 92150 Suresnes - France
On 23-Oct-14 12:24, Irene Wang wrote:
Hello, 

I am currently trying to implement Reproducible Version Qualifiers in my Tycho build according to the doc on the Wiki. To test, I am building based on identical source, and thus I expect all my artifacts to be identically versioned and exist in my baseline repositories. I have pointed <baselineRepositories> to five different p2 repositories created during previous product builds, which I have available on the local file system. 

In my log (with -X debugging active), I see that the jgit-generated qualifier for each plugin (e.g. "6.0.0.20141021_1702-SNAPSHOT") matches the qualifier for the same artifact found in the artifacts.xml of at least one of the referenced p2 repositories. However, for each plugin I have "No baseline version MavenProject". 

Would you have any suggestions on how I could debug why my artifacts are not being located correctly in my baseline repositories? I would be glad to provide any additional details that may be necessary. 

Thanks in advance, 

Irene 



Back to the top