[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tycho-dev] [Tycho Users] RE: OSGi runtime embedding
|
Done with 902c938
Regards
Tobias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sievers, Jan [mailto:jan.sievers@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 December 2010 19:21
> To: tycho-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Tycho Users] RE: OSGi runtime embedding
>
> > Has this been merged already?
>
> not yet, but I have it on my list.
>
> Regards
> Jan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Fedorenko [mailto:ifedorenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010 18:43
> To: tycho-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Tycho Users] RE: OSGi runtime embedding
>
> I like it, assuming everything still works, of course ;-).
>
> Has this been merged already?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
> On 10-12-13 07:16 AM, Oberlies, Tobias wrote:
> > Good point. I had forgotten about the
> "osgi.compatibility.bootdelegation" option, which does basically the same
> thing as org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=*. (For a discussion of these
> options, see for example here [1]). And setting
> osgi.compatibility.bootdelegation=false breaks Tycho.
> >
> > So the proposed change [2] doesn't change much. We should still apply it
> to get the performance benefit the Equinox guys originally developed the
> osgi.compatibily.bootdelegation option for.
> >
> > I'll provide the same patches with updated commit message at [2].
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> >
> > [1] http://toberlies.blogspot.com/2010/09/osgi-equinox-and-missing-
> package.html
> > [2] https://github.com/oberlies/sonatype-
> tycho/commits/system_packages_extra
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sievers, Jan [mailto:jan.sievers@xxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 13 December 2010 11:15
> >> To: tycho-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [Tycho Users] RE: OSGi runtime embedding
> >>
> >> we should carefully check
> >>
> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162231
> >>
> >> before we change anything wrt classloader bootdelegation.
> >>
> >> Jan
