| I've checked the report and there are definitely a series of
    warnings that I want to have resolved. 
 Good idea to add it in our build!
 
 cheers
 erwin
 Op 25/01/2016 om 21:26 schreef Erwin de
      Ley:
 
      
      Hi Christopher,
 I agree that we should follow all kinds of good practices, and
      FindBugs probably has a valid set of them in its default rules.
 
 But... for the ErrorCode naming I'm a bit afraid to end up with
      many long names for each extension of the base ErrorCode
      pseudo-enum.
 And that this could reduce readability of code i.o. improving it.
 
 E.g. for a typical usage of an extended ErrorCode such as
      org.eclipse.triquetrum.processing.ErrorCode : in
      DefaultTaskProcessingBroker there is a line like :
 
 futResult.completeExceptionally(new
      ProcessingException(ErrorCode.TASK_UNHANDLED, "No service found
      for " + task, null));
 
 I think this is quite readable, and better than e.g.
 
 futResult.completeExceptionally(new
      ProcessingException(ProcessingErrorCode.TASK_UNHANDLED, "No
      service found for " + task, null));
 
 We could maybe start using static imports if we go for the
      specialized names? Then such code would become
 
 futResult.completeExceptionally(new
      ProcessingException(TASK_UNHANDLED, "No service found for " +
      task, null));
 
 Personally I'm not fond of static imports, but I see many of our
      younger developers using them, so maybe I'm just a bit
      old-fashioned ;-)
 What do you think?
 
 regards
 erwin
 
 
 Op 25/01/2016 om 20:44 schreef
        Christopher Brooks:
 
        
        Erwin,I've set up FindBugs, see
        
        https://hudson.eclipse.org/triquetrum/job/triquetrum/findbugs
 
 There are a bunch of warnings like https://hudson.eclipse.org/triquetrum/job/triquetrum/4/findbugsResult/module.232003606/
 
 
          One fix would be to rename
        org.eclipse.triquetrum.validation.ErrorCode to
        org.eclipse.triquetrum.validation.ErrorCodeValidation or
        something.
            
              
                
               
                | The class name
                      org.eclipse.triquetrum.validation.ErrorCode
                      shadows the simple name of the superclass
                      org.eclipse.triquetrum.ErrorCode  This class has a simple name that is identical to
                    that of its superclass, except that its superclass
                    is in a different package (e.g., alpha.Fooextendsbeta.Foo). This can be
                    exceptionally confusing, create lots of situations
                    in which you have to look at import statements to
                    resolve references and creates many opportunities to
                    accidently define methods that do not override
                    methods in their superclasses. |  
 Or, we could ignore it.
 
 I've found that fixing as many FindBugs warnings as possible is
        really helpful because it makes the actual bugs standout.  The
        downside of fixing these bugs is that some of the changes are
        not natural.
 
 What are your thoughts?
 
 _Christopher
 
 -- 
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 707.332.0670           (Office: 545Q Cory) 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
triquetrum-dev mailing list
triquetrum-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/triquetrum-dev
 
 |