Hi all,
I am seeing similar things on my end. Also very busy with PR reviews and creating IP issues for updated dependencies with the PRs.
What I am encountering more and more is, that while fixing requested changes there are also new versions of 3rd party dependencies introduces.
This of course requires another set of IP issues.
As general information. IP issues that are create via dash have a due date of +1 week (currently). This is a (in my opinion) very fair amount of time that we must grant the EF team to investigate issues for us.
This also means, that PRs with new IP issues are “delayed”. So please try to avoid updating dependencies on open PRs, as long as it is not necessary for fixing the findings
I hope you can understand, that the QG checks and PR reviews is a time consuming task for every committer, especially if PRs are not well prepared and the reviewing committer is not directly part of the product team.
But still this is a crucial part in our release process.
Maybe together we can come up with a better strategy/agreement/process, so that the topic isn’t becoming to frustrating for all sides and still guarantees proper quality.
Best regards,
Sebastian
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Sebastian Bezold
Software Engineer
Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
(ehemals/formerly Daimler TSS GmbH)
Wilhelm-Runge-Straße 11
89081 Ulm/Germany
Sebastian.Bezold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.mercedes-benz-techinnovation.com

Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
Sitz und Registergericht/Domicile and Register Court: Ulm, HRB-Nr./Commercial Register No.: 3844
Geschäftsführung/Management:
Daniel Geisel (Vorsitzender/Chairperson), Isabelle Krautwald
Von:
tractusx-dev <tractusx-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> im Auftrag von "carsten.lenz--- via tractusx-dev" <tractusx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Antworten an: tractusx developer discussions <tractusx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: Dienstag, 9. Mai 2023 um 12:58
An: "tractusx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tractusx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Lenz, Carsten (415)" <carsten.lenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: [tractusx-dev] GitHub Pull Request reviews
[**EXTERNAL E-MAIL**]
Hi all,
as you all know, we’re in the middle of QG4 checks for upcoming TractusX release 3.1. System Team is doing these checks based on Jira Ticket/GH Issues and findings are reported as GH Issues in Tractusx repositories. We
try to be as transparent as possible.
Currently, I feel a bit offended and annoyed, and I will tell you why:
We as Consortia System Team Members put a lot of effort into these QG checks. If you open PRs to fix QG check findings, then please respect requested changes made by others and don’t merge PRs with changes requested.
Either discuss the requested changes with the requester or think about to implement the requested changes, there might be good reasons for.
If you ignore them, like in this case, you’ll have to open another PR potentially resulting in an additional release of your Application, Helm Chart or whatever - and you must deal with an annoyed System Team member and
read this kind of mails.
Cheers Carsten
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Carsten Lenz
Senior Reliability Engineer
Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation (ehemals/formely Daimler TSS)
Digital Value Platforms
Wilhelm-Runge-Straße 11
89081 Ulm/Germany
www.mercedes-benz-techinnovation.com

Mercedes Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
Sitz und Registergericht/Domicile and Register Court: Ulm, HRB-Nr./Commercial Register No.: 3844
Geschäftsführung/Management: Daniel Geisel (Vorsitzender/Chairperson), Isabelle Krautwald
If you are not the addressee, please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail by mistake, and delete it. We thank you for your support.
|