Re: [tracecompass-dev] "Official" Tracecompass github?

[Matthew Khouzam <matthew.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I tend to communicate by patches. ;)
I didn't know about that one, it is the right way to do things, let's go
for it!

On 15-05-25 05:41 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> How about https://github.com/eclipse ? ;)
>
> Any project can ask to get mirrored on Eclipse's Github. We would just
> have to ping our EMO.
>
>
> However, if we don't intend on accepting external contributions
> through Github, I am not sure it would be really useful. You mention
> you have 7-8 forks of the project, are you really sharing patches with
> 7-8 different people?
>
> If it's only to pull paches, you could use one unique repo and setup
> several remotes locally.
> On the other hand, if you do want to share patches with other people
> (and not send to to the "official" repo, at least not right away),
> then from what I understand of how Github works, you would *still*
> have to handle 7-8 forks on your own Github.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
>
> On 2015-05-25 05:16 PM, Matthew Khouzam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you look at my github, you will see 7-8 forks of trace compass. The
>> reason is, we are not using github properly IMO.
>> We need a curated tracecompass main repo on github, and for people to
>> fork from that one. I'm not sure about the IP implications of doing
>> this, does anyone know if we're allowed to do that? We cannot I think,
>> use ericsson's official github. I am still trying to find who is in
>> charge of it, maybe Efficios's github could be the official tracecompass
>> branch? If we get a company name behind it, I think the workflow will
>> clean up like this.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Matthew.
>>
>