|Re: [tools-pmc] aCute *wish* to participate in Simultaneous Release
You bring up a good point about the rule to state intent early. When switching to allow minor releases in the quarters, I’m not sure we thought through the timing of these things. Even with CDT we won’t publish our first real Photon build
until M5. We have a pretty big release for Oxygen.2 coming up taking what little resources we have.
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mickael Istria
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't consider that stating in November that aCute would like to be in by June is a rush ;)
But you're right, if going into Photon.1 is the only path possible, it's not so bad.
I agree. But in that case, it means that the "state intent early" rule is not so necessary. I think it's something Planning Council should clarify. For example by saying "state intent early, but it's fine if you don't and the project isn't
upstream of anything".
Back to the top