|Re: [tools-pmc] Eclipse LDT and Oxygen|
Hi, Sorry again, I didn't understood questions was for me. I will try to explain the situation : LDT project is not really supported by SierraWireless anymore. There is no more active committers. Metalua project on which LDT is based is not active anymore.I'm the last "active" members of the LDT team but it's difficult to find time and motivation in this condition. As there is still some users of LDT (~80 000 download last years), I try to continue to do some bug fixes and to integrate LDT in release train but I missed to declare the LDT participation in Oxygen in time :/.
Simon Le 05/04/2017 à 18:57, David Williams a écrit :
As far as I am concerned, we should consider the matter closed, with approval -- but, others may expect more.Here is the history as I know it: Wayne proactively petitioned the PC in February:https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg02684.htmlSince he mentioned " ... supposed to have PMC approval ..." I posted my approval inhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03939.html as did Roland, in https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03942.html Alex gave his approval (with a question) in https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03940.htmlAnd Doug gave his approval sort asking for the LDT project to say more ...Wayne did post one message to that list at https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00086.html with one small reply at https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00087.htmlUnless others want more, I think all these message imply "awareness and approval" and no need to force more process than that.And ... perhaps we (our Planning Council Rep :) can participate more formally in the future.If anyone expects more, please say so and follow up as needed. Thanks, On 04/05/2017 12:06 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:I would if the LDT gang would feed me what I need to say. I haven¹t been following the issue. Doug.On 2017-04-03, 4:41 PM, "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of WayneBeaton" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:AFAICT, the Eclipse Tools PMC has not actually brought a petition for Eclipse LDT to participate in the Eclipse Oxygen simultaneous release to the Eclipse Planning Council. I believe that this is just a technicality, as Eclipse LDT has been participating in the build since before M4. Assuming that I haven't missed something important, can the EclipseTools PMC's Planning Council representative please add this to the agenda?Thanks, Wayne -- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation _______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe>from this list, visit_______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit_______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
Back to the top