|Re: [tools-pmc] PMC Approval for Oomph 1.5.0|
I agree with Doug. You should at least mention or point out which bugs lead to the minor increment. Especially since you version all your features and bundles exactly the same, it would be hard (or impossible) for anyone to know without some more detail.
And, as Doug implies, minor increments really should be in RC1. I don't think Oomph's minor increment was, but correct me if I am mistaken. Is this unclear? Or did simply a late change require the minor increment?
I am asking this questions primarily to figure out what needs to be improved in the process -- not because I am opposed to Oomph make the change or releasing "1.5".
Thanks, On 09/12/2016 01:47 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I¹m OK with this. Mind you, it¹s really late given Neon.1 is currently building RC4 and there¹s very little information in the review other than a list of bugs/enhancements. Assuming no one vetoes by tomorrow, I¹d say you¹re a go. Doug. On 2016-09-12, 1:32 PM, "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Eike Stepper" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of stepper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dear PMC members, Please approve the Oomph 1.5.0 release that is scheduled to coincide with Eclipse Neon.1. The release review material can be found at https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.oomph/releases/1.5.0/review . Cheers /Eike ---- http://www.esc-net.de http://thegordian.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/eikestepper _______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe>from this list, visit_______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
Back to the top