But with one very strong suggestion.
In fact, let's say a conditional +1 :)
I think on the "front page"
of your review materials you should mention the same thing you did in this
note: "Note this release changes the major field of version number
since there were some deprecated APIs removed (see N&N for details)"
Or something like that. I'd say probably as a paragraph in your initial
= = = = =
More minor, I think it's always nice
to say something on front page about "72 bugs fixed" or similar
-- this is the place to brag a little. :)
Also minor, I think "communities"
usually should mention the "3 pillars" -- 1. committers and contributors
as you do (though, to stay vendor neutral, I would not mention "Zend
Technologies" -- but, minor comment). 2. adopters (as I think you
do) but also 3. user community (usually reflected in "forum activity,
bugs opened by users" or other similar things.
These minor suggestions are just that
... suggestions -- not part of the "condition".
= = = = =
Most minor of all -- my own personal
user-question :) -- I still see "Unsupported Content type in Editor".
I've always assumed that was my own "install mistake" or something.
But if that is a known issue, let me know the bug or work around.
Thanks. I am very glad you (and others)
have kept the project going!
Dawid Pakuła <zulus@xxxxxxxxx> To:
Tools PMC mailing list
05/23/2016 04:26 PM Subject:
PMC Approval for PDT 4.0 Sent by:
Dear PMC Members
I’m requesting PMC approval for PDT 4.0
major release that is scheduled to coincide with Eclipse Neon.0. The release contains both bug fixes and new
features  :
-- Dawid Pakuła_______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc