Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for [Titan Committers]

Hi David,


As per your previous e-mail:



“As your contributors develop some history "in the open", that you can document, then please renominate them. You do not have to wait and do all 6 at once :) ... I expect these will get more scrutiny the second time through, so suggest there be several substantiative contributions that show knowledge of domain and the code -- not just "cleaning up warnings" or similar easy things. IMO, 4 or 5 such commits would suffice. BTW, it is important that potential committers do have "commits", but there can be supportive information, such as presentations, wiki authorship, mailing list activity, etc., if that helps you document their "open" activity. ”



Each of the nominated committers have now 10-20 commits  , as seen below :

( their activity is  also visible in the IP log ,


Also,  would-be–committers  have started to track bugs in bugzilla, see screenshot at bottom.


I hope this will be considered as documented contribution history.



Best regards
























From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:36 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for [Titan Committers]


PMC Members,

I may be missing something, but I do not see any difference between this round of "nominations with no history" compared to last March when it was tried.

Anyone have any additional information that I am not aware of?

It appears they are doing their work in github -- I assume for "issues" too? -- and off the top of my head, I do not know easy ways to "look for authors", etc. from there.

On the other hand, the project is in some sort of trouble, so if they are trying to "reboot" themselves, I'd hate to stand in the way of that.

Suggestions? Insights?


From:        portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx (portal on behalf of emo)
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        05/11/2016 04:56 AM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Arpad Lovassy
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

tools PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
Arpad Lovassy's Committer status on the tools.titan project. As a PMC
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
portal page:

Arpad Lovassy was nominated by Elemer Lelik as follows:
member of Eclipse Titan development team

Vote summary: 4/0/0 with 0 not voting
 +1  Elemer Lelik
 +1  Gyorgy Rethy
 +1  Kristof Szabados
 +1  Gabor Szalai

tools-pmc mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top