I understand your confusion and I ‘m the guilty one for creating such a confusing situation.
Let me explain: the development of Eclipse Titan is ongoing in Ericsson, and there’s a developer team taking care of that. Up until recently, the workflow
was to update from time to time the public github repositories
from our internal git repositories ( which usually was proxied by me) , but Wayne pointed out that this is not in accordance with the transparency and openness
required by the Eclipse development model.
Which we understood and now we are preparing to move all our development in the open; but for this the whole team needs committer rights so they can continue
working in github (and Bugzilla etc.) under the same conditions they did before
So the new committer rights requested are for developers who are de facto developing Titan currently. Once committer rights attributed , we can cut over
to the tools provided by Eclipse.
I hope this is will be favorably acknowledged by the PMC.
Thank you for your understanding and best regards
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 10:36 PM
Cc: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: [tools-pmc] Fw: PMC approval needed for committer vote for ....
We, the Tools PMC were asked to approve 6 new committer elections similar to the attached one. Normally that is a wonderful thing. But, in this case, there was no evidence given of Eclipse commits
or history, which is typically required to become a new committer. That is how Eclipse ensures "merit" and not simply that someone, say, works for a certain employer.
Normally, if a project has "just started" we do not mind bending the rules a little, but Titan has been at Eclipse for one year now, so I would think that is time enough to learn the Eclipse rules
and process, and also time enough for new committers to develop some history with the project.
So can Elemer or someone explain to the PMC a little more what this is about? Did the nominations just fail to mention the commits and history at Eclipse? Was there some special new contribution
of code? Or is there a misunderstanding of what it takes to become a new committer?
I don't mean to slow things down, and certainly don't want to discourage new committers -- I am sure they are all worthy. But, I do feel an obligation to "enforce the rules" that everyone must
follow since every exception makes the next one easier, until there are no rules at all! Especially for 6 committers at once! Makes me think something is going on that is not well understood or documented?
----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 03/08/2016 04:19 PM -----
From: portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx (portal on behalf of emo)
Date: 03/08/2016 04:49 AM
Subject: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Arpad Lovassy
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
tools PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
Arpad Lovassy's Committer status on the tools.titan project. As a PMC
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
Arpad Lovassy was nominated by Elemer Lelik as follows:
member of Titan developer team
Vote summary: 4/0/0 with 0 not voting
+1 Elemer Lelik
+1 Gyorgy Rethy
+1 Kristof Szabados
+1 Gabor Szalai
tools-pmc mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit